From 8069944ebbc251a83eb1094b1d38628cbb313dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leon van Kammen Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:56:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9F=94=A7=20master:=20work=20in=20progress?= =?UTF-8?q?=20[might=20break]?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- index.html | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 1520b2e..5554a58 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -487,6 +487,25 @@
+
+ + Q: How do you identify "XR interoperability-washing"?
+ A: "XR interoperability-washing" is akin to greenwashing; it occurs when companies aggressively market a commitment to open standards while their top-down corporate structures make true interoperability technically impossible.
These entities often promote:
+ + +
+ Metaphor: XR interoperability-washing is similar to a DNS-company (which allows you to register a domain) disables the 'transfer a domain'-feature. +
+ + While these methods may offer limited connectivity, they fall short of providing a sustainable, seamless "world-to-world" browsing experience (XR hypermedia).
+In contrast, (bottom-up) XR hypermedia offers a more cost-efficient path.
By removing the need to protect stakeholders, centralized user bases, or specific crypto-wallets, it flips the traditional power structure.
In this model, the user—not the corporate stakeholder—is the starting point and operator of the network. +